Which legal concept requires officers to inform suspects of their rights?

The legal concept that requires officers to inform suspects of their rights is associated with Miranda rights. This concept stems from the U.S. Supreme Court case Miranda v. Arizona (1966), which established that individuals taken into police custody must be informed of their rights, including the right to remain silent and the right to an attorney. This procedure aims to protect a suspect’s Fifth Amendment right against self-incrimination and ensures they understand their rights before any interrogation takes place. Failure to provide these warnings can result in any statements made by the suspect being inadmissible in court, a principle aimed at safeguarding individual liberties during police interactions.

In contrast, due process refers broadly to the legal requirement that the state must respect all legal rights owed to a person. The exclusionary rule prevents the use of evidence obtained in violation of a defendant's constitutional rights, but it does not specifically address the requirement to inform suspects of their rights. Probable cause is the standard required for law enforcement to make arrests or conduct searches, which is unrelated to informing suspects about their rights.